David Robinson – The Layman’s Guide – Practical Lawful Dissent
The following piece was written by the late David Robinson, and published to the website denouncethedeception.co.uk, which can only now be accessed through the web archives.
Within his writings he outlines the steps required to peacefully stand under the law and resist the corrupt and treasonous administrations that continue to harm us all today.
David talks about his own personal experiences using this process, as well as describing and detailing the events of treason that have been committed over the last few centuries and how to peacefully restore our common law constitution, Magna Carta 1215.
15-03-2017 by David Robinson
THE EMPEROR WEARS NO CLOTHES
“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within.
An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself.
For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men.
He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear.”
― Marcus Tullius Cicero
Standing Against a Corrupt System
This publication has been written in layman’s terms as much as possible to provide the reader with the necessary tools to stand up against an incredibly corrupt system of administration in Britain and the Commonwealth today, peacefully and whilst standing entirely under the protection of the law using nothing but legal evidenced facts.
Please understand that the common law judicial system in Britain and the Commonwealth has been systematically dismantled since at least 1848 when the grand juries were removed from service. The grand jury process is a fundamental part of the law of the land and should never have been allowed to be replaced by the corporate magistrate courts that we have today, especially without the consent of the people. More on this later.
To change ANY constitutional safeguard without first obtaining the consent of the people is treason. High treason is to hand over the authority and decision making processes which governs the people to any foreign entity, without first being beaten in open battle. What most people consider to be law these days is not law at all.
The ‘banksters’ have sought to take control over governments for many generations now, and have largely succeeded in doing so on a global scale by controlling the flow of information, education, wealth, and by manipulating common concepts.
Amchel Rothschild quote, “Give me control of a nation’s money supply, and I care not who makes its laws”.
Illegal wars have been created by false flag terrorism events that are destroying other sovereign nations on earth, its a war on sovereignty as there is no place for sovereignty within the “Big Society” Cameron mentioned.
Millions of civilians have been culled in the middle east by our so called leaders, done in our names under the guise of a war on terrorism, but many lives are also being destroyed at home more covertly, although it is being done in plain sight if we care to look at all the evidence. I don’t intend to go into all of the problems here.
The Dismantling of British Common Law
ALL true law in Britain and the Commonwealth is protected by the constitution which was created by the peoples uprisings against tyranny in the past. The law also complies with the 10 commandments in the Christian faith which is at the heart of British law.
The constitution is consented to by the good people because it is natural law, it guarantees justice for all and is very simple to understand. It protects the innocent and vulnerable and is simply common sense.
The sovereign peoples of Britain and the Commonwealth consent to be ‘governed’ by the common laws of the realm because they are just, not ‘ruled’ by corporate policies that do not comply with the constitution and are unjust, which is what we have going on today.
It is not denied by those pretending to be in service to the people that we are policed by consent in Britain. This simply means as said, we consent to be governed by a fair and just system of service as subjects of a constitutional monarchy under the common laws and customs of the realm.
The monarchy today is anything but constitutional therefore we all have a duty under the law (Article 61 MC 1215) to reject the crown until the constitution is once again properly observed. We have a duty to ourselves, ancestors and to those yet unborn to safeguard the laws that protect us all equally against injustices.
David Robinson – Practical Lawful Dissent
My name is David Robinson and I have been standing in open rebellion against the crown (as demanded by law) since March 2010. I have enjoyed a 100% success rate with every process that I have completed by using Article 61 of the Magna Carta against all demands made upon me (and upon others) by the present illegal administration. I have acted successfully with power of attorney for two other people as well as protecting myself from aiding and abetting a rogue government.
I began my individual legal/lawful stance against the corrupted system in 2010 by conditionally accepting an £80 fine that I had received from DVLA for not displaying a tax disc.
After completing a simple process of putting all concerned on Notice (i.e., police, courts, DVLA etc) that I was standing in lawful rebellion, and that I had lawful excuse not to consent to their illegal demands for tax, summonses, fines etc, and that it would be a criminal offence for me to do so.
I achieved a stalemate situation whereby nobody would act against me because if they did they would be acting against the British constitution in full knowledge of the facts, therefore evidently aiding and abetting high treason at common law, a very serious crime indeed.
Treason and the Erosion of Constitutional Authority
The death penalty still exists in Britain for high treason, never mind what the so called government may say. ‘They’ claim that the 1795 Treasonable and Seditious Practices Act was repealed in 1998 when the Right Dishonorable Tony Blair introduced the Crime and Disorder Act, in chapter 36 he attempted to repeal the 1795 Act and the death penalty for high treason but Blair had no lawful authority to do so, and he committed treason in his attempt.
He committed three counts of high treason in all (among other very serious crimes). He would be in prison today if only the people would stand united under the common law in lawful rebellion as the law demands. The remedy to this mess relies on the people uniting and rejecting their demands, whilst at the same time demanding that the police act according to the evidenced facts and assist the people in this monumental struggle, all it takes is numbers –
Your country needs YOU!!! The corporations (led by the Bankster’s) have taken over the governments of Britain and the Commonwealth alike. All elections for the past few decades have been rigged, allowing the corporate elite criminals to rule by deception and coercion.
This can only continue if the people are kept in the dark or decide to do nothing once they have been informed of the facts. Personally, I will never aid and abet such a disgusting regime as that would make me equally guilty for their acts of terrorism, paedophilia, genocide and many other very serious crimes, which are all well evidenced.
I don’t intend to go into all of the problems within this publication but you already know things aren’t right. It’s time to focus on the remedy whilst we still can. I first entered into lawful rebellion in March 2010 by serving two affidavits on the crown (Buckingham palace) with the first affidavit demanding that the Nice treaty (France) be repealed and parliament be prorogued (ended its term and calling for a general election).
Article 61 of the Magna Carta: A Lawful Weapon for Dissent
I provided them with 40 days (as is required by constitutional law – Article 61 of Magna Carta 1215) to remedy their unconstitutional behaviour. After 40 days had elapsed with no response I denounced my presumed allegiance to the crown within the second affidavit. From there on in my lawful duty is to distress the crown and reject its alleged authority until redress has been achieved.
I didn’t need to individually petition the crown however because previously in 1999 a committee of 68 barons had convened to discuss whether or not it was unconstitutional to enter into the EU’s treaty of Nice (France).
The evidence proved that it was an act of high treason to enter into such an agreement so they dutifully (according to the correct protocols of British constitutional law) petitioned the crown, demanding that she (QE2) not ratify the Nice treaty.
After their petition was only vaguely replied to and the treaty of Nice was passed into law anyway, the barons committee invoked Article 61 of the 1215 Magna Carta on the 23rd day of March 2001. It has not since been revoked publicly by the barons which means that Britain and the entire Commonwealth is in a state of open rebellion i.e., the law demands that ALL British and Commonwealth subjects rebel against the crown in order to protect the British constitution, whilst doing so we are protecting our god given rights and freedoms that the constitution defends (our individual and collective sovereignty).
By courageously invoking Article 61 the committee of the barons provided us all with a peaceful remedy against the systematic deconstruction of our ancient laws and customs by imposters within Westminster.
Britain (constitutionally) has a very good system of justice but it has been denied us for generations, and most people think that the corporate rules being used today are laws! Any rule that does not comply with the British constitution is NOT a law.
A Decade of Lawful Dissent
Rules require your consent (tacit or otherwise) and the law of course demands that nobody consent to treasonous rules. The common law has our consent because it is fair to all. Britain has ‘National Sovereignty’ within a common law jurisdiction. If this is not the case today then treason MUST have been committed.
Indeed treason has been committed many times and is still being committed to this very day. National Sovereignty means that we are all literally kings and queens in our own land, it has to be that way if real equality under the law is to exist.
ONLY those who are working within the system as public servants are at that time, not sovereign beings because they are in service to the sovereign (people) until they clock off from work, and once they have, they automatically revert back to their natural sovereign state of being.
To cut a long story short I ended up conditionally accepting demands to attend their court summonses (for alleged driving offences), not paying any fines that were imposed on me in my absence and refusing to consent to an arrest warrant issued by the so called court.
I have never paid a penny of said fines, never been to court and the police wouldn’t arrest me when I walked into Bath city police station (in 2012) to report the crimes being committed against me by various public servants, including a police chief inspector for roads traffic policing, a court manager, legal advisor, the attorney general at the time (Dominic Grieve) and, an agent of the DVLA.
Five years on (2 years doing the process) and still nobody has acted against me for the unpaid £700.00 fine or my none appearance in their corrupt courts, yet I am also ignored as I demand a trial by jury on the matter(s) of treason, coercion, torts against me etc in a properly convened court of law (court de jure – court with jury), because it is unlawful for me (or anyone else) to consent to their de facto courts, which are nothing more than private corporate entities trading for profit by deception, whilst using treasonous rules against us.
Exposing Illegitimate Courts: Article 61 in Action Against Corporate Judiciary
There are NO courts of law in Britain because they all gain their authority from the deposed crown. I later went on to help others stand against the system when I moved to Glastonbury because nobody in the judiciary, police or government would communicate with me, so I went to the people. I later acted with power of attorney for a couple of people to further prove article 61’s validity and won every battle that we entered into.
None of these battles went to a hearing in front of a jury as we demanded of course, the demands against my clients just fizzled out, summonses were not acted upon by the police, warrant officers or process servers and bailiffs did not act upon their threats either. We even stopped a 7 day committal order to prison for contempt of court issued by a so called district judge process included.
Two years on and my client has never been dragged into their corporate courts, nor has she served any time in prison or police stations, no fines have ever been paid by her nor has she complied with charges for water and sewage either (which is what the matter was all about).
We also had HMRC refund £1700.00 to another client whom had previously paid fines for not filling in tax returns for a few years. The fines kept on coming even though she had paid some of them under duress because of the threats she had received, so we decided to put the agents of HMRC on Notice of the fact that the crown has no authority to make such demands.
After HMRC agents realized that they had opened the flood gates by eventually zeroing her account and refunding what she had already paid, they sent a debt collection agency after her, I believe as a damage limitation exercise. The debt collection agency were put on Notice and they handed the matter back to HMRC who again zeroed her account.
The ONLY argument we used was that they have no authority to make any demands since Article 61 came into effect…..another rebel brother whom has had a similar result against HMRC is now attempting to claim back all the tax he has paid since the 23rd March 2001 when article 61 was invoked….there is no reason why he shouldn’t succeed but we will see.
Debunking the “Freeman on the Land” Movement
I began my rebellious career by claiming to be a “freeman” within my documents, I was a free man as I wasn’t in prison and have never been. I stood stubborn on the first point and did not go too deeply into their rules until jurisdiction was proven and it never was of course. The freeman on the land movement is a very different movement than the lawful rebellion one.
A ‘free man’ (to my understanding) means someone not already incarcerated and therefore not restricted. Sadly the freeman movement misdirects good people into using their rules against them. I soon realised that by using their rules and attempting to remedy any lawful/legal matter within their courts was double think, illegal, and would never remedy the fact that treason is being committed.
Instead, I decided to only use the laws (not rules) of the land (British Constitution) to challenge the system and by doing so, defend myself and others against their corruption.
To deny/denounce the British constitution publicly is sedition which is another very serious crime and is why they ignore our Notices. By ignoring us they tacitly agree to the contents of our notices by acquiescence under the law. The same applies if we ignore their notices which is why we don’t.
All demands on you are unenforceable if you use this remedy correctly but that wont stop them trying to scare you into consenting. Courts are not courts of law and they all know it.
Police constables are nothing more than corporate policy enforcers today, most police men and women don’t even know what real law is or where it comes from because they have never been educated with regard to the British constitution.
THE BASIC PROCESS WITH EXAMPLES OF SUCCESSFUL NOTICES USED:
Step 1.
Create an Oath of allegiance to the committee of the barons or declare your standing under article 61 within a ‘Notice’ served on a Police chief inspector (or above the rank of), or an alleged judge, magistrate or any other agent of the crown that has an oath of office.
The Oath of allegiance can either be sent by recorded post to one of the accepting barons or simply kept as a document proving your intent. It needs to be signed and dated by yourself and three signatory witnesses to make it a legal instrument, which can then be used as evidence of your lawful standing (intent) within any process you may undertake.
If your oath is returned or gets lost (if you post it to a baron) it doesn’t matter, the fact that you posted it and have a copy proves intent and, intent is very important in law. You are no longer an outlaw once you join the rebellion.
Oath Of Allegiance To Barons
The Oath of Allegiance To Barons and Oath of Allegiance to Self, as well as a Guide on what to do can be found on the Notices page.
Sworn and subscribed on: (Date) Signed. 3 Signatory witnesses (anyone on or over the age of 21 can witness your oath, they do not need to be professional people and nobody is going to question the validity of your witnesses anyway).
NOTE…you can word your Oath as you wish as long as you follow the basic structure of its intent and purpose. The same applies with all Notices, Affidavits etc
Step 2.
Send a ‘Notice of Conditional Acceptance’ to any individual acting as an agent for the crown with regard to any demands that you may receive.
You are not saying that you wont comply with their demand(s) you are instead stating that you will comply with all of their demands as long as it is legal for you to do so since article 61 was invoked.
Notice Of Conditional Acceptance
Step 3.
Send a follow up ‘Notice of default and opportunity to cure’ once the time frame for you receiving a response to your first notice has expired or they have ignored your conditions (we normally give between 7-14 days for a response depending on the urgency of the matter).
This second notice is providing them with another opportunity to respond to the first Notice of Conditional Acceptance if you have been ignored, or the question within the Notice has been ignored.
You can offer more opportunities to ‘cure’ (make good) if you like? The law demands that we offer at least one opportunity to cure to remain in honour. It is important to remain in honour in law.
Notice Of Default And Opportunity To Cure
Step 4.
Send a ‘Notice of Default’ to put an end to the matter. By ignoring you they will have tacitly agreed to all the points you made within your Notices, they are in dishonour and cannot legally pursue you further.
ALL public servants have a ‘duty of care’ to respond to any concerns of the public.
Notice Of Default
Step 5.
If the demands continue however (they are sometimes automated) we serve a Notice of Misprision of Treason on the individual(s).
This Notice contains evidence that treason is being committed and, that the agent is aiding and abetting a criminal administration.
Everybody has a duty under British constitutional law to stand in defence of the constitution under article 61 when it is in effect, and we also have a duty to compel others to stand with us.
The bottom line is that by taking this stance we are only acting according to the laws of the land. Nothing more.
Notice Of Coercion To Aid And Abet High Treason & Misprision Of Treason
Step 6.
Another Notice that can be used is the Notice to Stop. Used to put further pressure on any agent before the Misprision of Treason notice is served, and again after if necessary.
Notice To Stop
When dealing with bailiffs or anyone threatening to call at your property we serve them with an extra notice in addition to the process above, A ‘Removal of Implied Right of Access’ is sent by post and a copy also placed near or on the front door.
Removal of Implied Right of Access Notice
Affadavit of Truth
An Affidavit of truth is another powerful document because it must be rebutted point for point by another Affidavit. It is basically a statement of truth sworn too on penalty of perjury, so ONLY put in evidenced facts.
Number the points you make within the Affidavit that you require to be answered. Keep it simple and focus on the matter of jurisdiction before entering into irrelevant points like terms of contracts and their illegal rules. You can create whatever notice you like and head it as you like.
The more that are created individually the better because they tend to use the lame excuse that your “letter” was a template and as such can be dismissed, even if it is a template so what? You are free to use whatever words you choose to use. No matter if someone else’s words match your own.
Some people may think that an Affidavit needs to be notarised by a notary public but it can’t be unless that notary is standing in lawful rebellion (I’m writing strictly according to the constitution here).
Three signatory witnesses is fine. Who has the authority to deny your notices to be lawful anyway? If you still think the courts, police, councillors or any government agents do then you haven’t quite yet understood the process.
WHAT QUALIFIES YOU TO ACT WITH POWER OF ATTORNEY FOR OTHERS? (once you are well experienced with the lawful rebellion process)
ANSWER: Article 61 of Magna Carta 1215. I challenge any alleged official to deny it. A Notice of Lawful Objection is generally used to serve on the local chief inspector of police, if by rebelling you think the police may get involved.
You can also serve one of these notices on any institution that you may in future have dealing with….you will be acting honourably by attempting to seek clarity with regard to their legal stance and yours, before any action is due.
Notice Of Lawful Objection
Enclosed evidence: Exhibit A (Transcript of Daily Telegraph report on 24th March entitled ‘Peers Petition Queen on Europe’); Exhibit B (copy of Oath of Allegiance to the Committee of the Barons); Exhibit C (Transcript of the letters between Sir Robin Janvrin (Queens Private Secretary and the Barons Committee in 2001); Exhibit D (Article 61 translated text). (Evidence as from page 14 – 25 of this publication).
The British Constitution and Its Validity
There is a great deal of propaganda surrounding the British Constitution, the traitors/imposters within Westminster even (seditiously) state that we don’t have a written constitution, which is easily proven to be a blatant lie. The fact that the British constitution is not formally codified into one document makes no difference as to its validity.
Magna Carta 1215 is one of the founding documents of the British constitution, this cannot truthfully or legally be denied. It is in full effect today therefore, we are using the invocation of Article 61 to defend our rights and duty under the constitution not to aid and abet treason (and many other disgusting crimes).
The system today is completely corporate run and we are all being massively conned by it!
Some people sadly believe that it is just the way it is today and that nothing can be done, but there is something that you can do about it if you have a mind to do so.
You only need to have the will to act completely peacefully under the laws of the land with a little courage. Only a little knowledge of evidenced facts is required, you don’t need a degree in law to understand how we can each stand in defence of our birth-right and freedoms under the constitution.
Please remember that our mothers and fathers and their mothers and fathers created a welfare state from their taxes for future generations to enjoy.
Please also remember that many of them fought in muddy bloody trenches to defend this countries’ right to self governance, which we are collectively allowing to be destroyed today by being too damned subservient….. slowly, slowly the lies and deceptions have reduced our once great system of service under the common laws of the land, to a system of servitude to a self serving regime no matter what political party sits at the helm.
The truth of how the system is operating today, which is supposed to be operating as a service to us all, especially with regard to the law, is very different than most people have been led to believe. This is not their fault initially as the propaganda is rife and has been so for generations.
The Power of Unity and Article 61 Invocation
It’s the concept of who we are and our place within society that most people appear to struggle with, it’s not the process we use itself that they find difficult. You have much more power within society than you may realize, knowledge of the truth which cannot be denied because it is all well evidenced, is all that we use and require. The system is extremely corrupt and we all know it.
The ONLY real peaceful way out of this mess is to reassert the rule of law again, to do that we must demand it, all trials must be held in a properly convened court de jure for any reason whatsoever, who will deny you this when it is sedition to do so publicly? Nobody will, and so fines, summonses etc just vanish into the ether.
This remedy is powerful even used individually. Once we unite properly we can bring a class action against the so called government, and demand a hearing for the allegations of treason that many individuals have already made to the relevant alleged authorities. Unity is the key to successfully restoring the common laws that protect the good people of these shores.
That is what Article 61 was invoked to create UNITY….all good people standing together under the common law in order to protect it, which in turn protects our rights as free sovereign individuals, and as a nation to retain the right to self determination. It is basic common sense in my view.
In order to explain how very simple the lawful rebellion process is, and why we have no choice but to peacefully rebel against the crown at this time, and what is likely to happen if we don’t, we first need to take a look at the facts as well as some of the propaganda that has, over many generations been used to distort the consciousness of the masses. I call this ‘concept control’ rather than mind control but its the same thing really.
Concept Control and the Loss of Sovereignty
Social engineering has been the play-thing of the traitors for a long time. The biggest concept controller of them all, that was introduced en masse in the 1950’s has been the television set. It’s not so much the lies that are told but the subtle changing of words and concepts that I refer to here.
Like the changing of the word ‘benefit’ (of a welfare state) to ‘credit’ (universal credits). This changing of words changes how people view the system and their place within it. We have been slowly conned from understanding the reality, which is that we are a sovereign nation, whereby we each have ‘national sovereignty’ which guarantees our equal entitlement to justice, peace and basic needs.
This is extremely important to remember because without our sovereignty there can ONLY be slavery, most people are already slaves to the system today but with this information that is now a choice!
With the loss of national sovereignty goes the constitutional laws that PROTECT US THE PEOPLE, NOT THE REGIME this is why they are attempting to destroy the constitution, and even say that we don’t have a constitution (which is almost laughable, except for the fact that its far too serious a matter to be taken light heartedly.)
The imposters within Westminster state that Britain doesn’t have a written ‘codified’ constitution which is correct, but there is no requirement for a constitution to be laid down in one document (codified) in order to be valid.
The British constitution is unique as it has been created over many hundreds of years. It was the basis of many other later constitutions like the USA’s for example. It is most certainly written down and MUST be adhered to by all British and commonwealth constitutional subjects at all times, by doing so we protect the law that protects us the people which does not allow changes to the constitution without the peoples say so.
A constitutional convention of the people is a lawful requirement that must be done before it can be changed in any way whatsoever.
Corruption, Rebellion, and the Rule of Law
Another concept that has been deliberately changed by the imposters within Westminster is the concept that we vote governments into ‘power’, when the fact is we vote them into a position of ‘SERVICE’ to the people under constitutional law, which is the only true law that there is, and which stands under the 10 commandments also.
ALL other rules MUST comply with the ‘rule of law’ (British Constitution – the will of the people). Today they are using illegal corporate rules and concept control to mislead good people into coughing up their hard earned cash, and to blindly, ratchet by ratchet, accept a police state under global corporate control, whilst they are being kept too busy to look at what they are really doing.
Those who say they don’t have time to look at the threats to our liberty and safety deserve neither. The pen is mightier than the sword (or keyboard these days). We rebels only need to put the truth into written documents and post them to those people who are making demands on us, and also to inform the police that they also have a duty under the law (to stand under Article 61) to observe the evidenced facts themselves and to start acting according to the truth (not too much to ask is it?).
With enough of us putting pressure on the police they would eventually have no choice but to act according to the facts, some may even be silently glad that they have no choice bit to act or aid and abet treason?
All it takes is enough good people to stand by the truth assertively but peacefully, to bring about a just system again.
Please take responsibility and join the rebellion…moving on… The statement I made earlier (that “we vote them into a position of service”) is also a little misleading because ALL elections since at least the 1970’s have been rigged. We have had corporate representatives in positions of power for far too long!
They (collectively) have committed acts of sedition, treason, war crimes, false flag terrorism, murder/genocide, paedophilia, fraud, kidnapping etc, to name but a few of the more serious crimes that have been allowed to continue by the present system.
Erosion of Justice and Constitutional Safeguards
They control the mainstream media entirely, and they know how to use ‘double think’ and concept control to gradually mislead the people into accepting extreme changes to their environment.
Its called ‘boiling the frog’…apparently a frog wont notice the water getting hotter if it sits in a pan of cold water whilst it slowly comes to the boil…..time to jump out of the proverbial pot folks!
The police today (policy enforcers) don’t even know the law themselves because they stopped teaching it in universities decades ago. The process that we use to rebel educates them as to the facts, which they cannot then deny they know.
This provides us with clear evidence that they are well aware of the fact that Britain and the entire Commonwealth is in a position of open rebellion against the crown by law, meanwhile we build a case file against them and for our own defence by doing so, which may contain evidence of crimes committed within the system by public servants acting against us.
By not standing under the law themselves they are all acting in outlawry, as outlaws! Anybody today not standing under Article 61 is in point of fact an outlaw. The correct protocols of constitutional law were used to invoke Article 61 of Magna Carta 1215 on the 23rd day of March 2001 therefore, if it is denied publicly, that it is in effect today then that would be the crime of sedition at common law.
If any individual were then to act against you whilst you are standing under the protection that Article 61 provides, whilst they are on notice of the facts, then that would be an act of treason at common law (aiding and abetting High Treason).
Nobody wants to provide evidence of their crime of treason we have proven that time and time again whilst using Article 61 very successfully. The concern for many of us is that there are no courts of law in Britain nor the Commonwealth in these dangerous times, the corporate machine has been marching on for generations, but this is why we all must unite under the common law in order to protect it, and our rights, since Article 61 was invoked it is compulsory for us all to stand in defence of our nation, that is clearly the truth which cannot truthfully be denied.
Historical Context and the Grand Jury System
Convening a court of law that adheres to the constitution is all we need. Plus a few thousand silent witnesses perhaps? They have been dismantling our justice system for generations, the grand juries were repealed as far back as 1848 and the passing into law of the 1911 Parliament Act was an act of treason at common law, because it changed the constitutional protections of the people without consulting them first.
The royal prerogative was diluted, whereby the monarch was no longer able to stop or grant parliamentary Bills (proposed laws) without the aid of a government minister. It is constitutionally fundamental that the monarch of the day is the single last safeguard against unjust laws being introduced to the people.
The grand jury process is a fundamental part of the principle of equality before the law, and to protect all subjects against unnecessary breaches of the peace. The grand jury was convened only to decide whether or not the common laws of the land had been broken, and if so, they would pass a verdict of a ‘true Bill’ for a trial to ensue. If not then a ‘No Bill’ was the verdict and nothing more was done.
The grand jury existed up until 1933 but for matters abroad only. The Grand jury service was a fundamental part of our judicial system, run as a service to the people it provided the people with a remedy against loss or harm by another no matter their social status.
The people took the evidence to the grand jury service, providing a way for the dispute or claims to be sorted without a breach of the peace. If a true bill was declared then the matter would be sent to a petite court (a court with a jury of 12 ordinary people). Summonses would be issued and if the evidenced proved to be criminal, arrests maybe made.
The grand juries sat under the common laws of the realm which are reflected within various constitutional documents, the Bill and Declaration of Rights 1688/9 (respectively), Magna Carta 1215, The Petition of Rights 1628, Acts of Union 1707- 07, Coronation Oath Act 1688 etc…
The corporate Magistrates courts today (all corporate entities operating under the ‘Ministry of Justice Corporation’) are using unlawful rules against the concept controlled people, but only because they consent to it. Their so called law courts act entirely on presumptions, the presumption that you are the corporate legal entity and that you consent to their corporate rules is their hook.
We remove all of their presumptions automatically by standing under Article 61 and informing them of our standing. They can do nothing but break constitutional law by continuing actions against us, this is why we act strictly according to the constitution and nothing else.
The freeman on the land method, to use their rules against them in their so called courts, will never remedy the matter of treason. By using their rules and places of corporate business against them, they are consenting to those rules and granting authority to the so called courts to hear the matter. They will NEVER rule against themselves no matter how strong the evidence.
The common law (constitution) demands that we reject the crown not aid and abet it. WHERE DOES LAW ORIGINATE?
The simple answer is, from the people, whom over many generations, through times of war and hardship, united to force the tyranny from continuing within the realm, by creating treaties under threat of revolt in more hostile times and in more peaceful times Bills, Acts, Oaths, Declarations etc, were demanded and created, written down in various documents that enshrine the rights of the people under the natural laws of decency, so that equality peace and prosperity would be had by all sovereign people for all time, which has compiled our freedoms into written (therefore verifiable) documents.
Taking Action: Peaceful And Lawful Dissent
The great concept control lie on the BBC lately is the argument whether number 10 Downing Street or parliament holds the sovereignty (more double think/speak).
It is WE THE PEOPLE who hold the sovereignty since it is no longer held in trust by a constitutional monarch under Oath and contract (Coronation Oath).
Article 61 legally deposed the monarch of that service/duty, rejecting the crowns authority by the use of the constitutional laws that the monarch agrees to abide by under the coronation Oath Act 1688.
The sovereignty by default came straight back to the people the very first time the Oath was breached. It has been breached well over 3,500 times to date.
All that is being asked of us all is to unite with the common people under the ancient laws that protect the common people (not the crown and or corporations), and to act peacefully and honourably at all times whilst doing so, by observing the evidenced facts ONLY. Its a far cry from the muddy fields of Flanders, lest we forget.
All you need to do is create an Oath of allegiance or simply declare your standing under Article 61, which the law demands we all do, and then to simply conditionally accept whatever demand comes your way, on proof that they have the lawful authority to make that demand since Article 61 came into effect.
The crown has absolutely no authority today, it’s a crime to even pay tax or aid and abet her majesties government or any aspect of the crown in any way. That is the simple fact of the matter which cannot be denied as it is entirely evidential.
Its invocation was reported within some of the mainstream press at the time…though not front page news as it ought to have been! (Look up ‘Peers petition Queen on Europe’ Daily Telegraph 24th March 2001).
I may repeat things that have already been written herein, but repeating it may help you understand how simple this process is? Since I used this process myself beginning 7 years ago, I have never appeared for any summons nor paid any of the fines that were demanded in my absence, furthermore, I more recently used Article 61 several times for other people whilst they granted me power of attorney over their legal affairs.
Personal Success Does Not Mean Victory
Article 61 qualifies me and you to have power of attorney BTW. Although I can boast a 100% success rate with every process that I have completed, if success is to create a stalemate situation that is?
It maybe a victory of sorts on a personal level but it doesn’t remedy the fact that the country is being run by criminals so we all need to do a lot more. Educating others by using the process successfully is the best way to go in my opinion.
Lobbying the police should be done by us all. Politicians are NOT above the law and they are all (at least) aiding and abetting a treasonous system of administration. In order to keep the peace whilst we rebel we MUST get the police to back the evidenced truth and to act according to their warrant card, without fear nor favour.
This can be done if enough of us demand they do it. We denied a 7 day committal order to prison for contempt of court from ever being carried out, council tax demands and bailiff threats all failed to enforce their will against us, a cannabis cultivation charge (36 plants that were in fact hemp, but the policy enforcers claimed them to be cannabis) ended due to lack of evidence?
HMRC returned fine monies paid for not filing tax returns for a few years, water and sewage demands have been impossible to enforce, various summonses and court orders have been denied and in October 2014, we even seized the town hall in Glastonbury by using Article 61 just to show that it is possible to do.
Glastonbury Town Hall Seizure
This peaceful, lawful way to ensure we protect our rights and freedoms should excite you, it did me when I realised its worth. We all have ‘LAWFUL EXCUSE’ not to pay tax and to deny the police any authority unless they are acting under oath (according to common law).
Upholding Common Law and Asserting Your Rights
We must still abide by common law ourselves whilst doing this, we do so and educate those unaware working within the system of the truth, and to demand our rights to a fair trial so that treason can be heard in a proper court of law.
We demand that any hearing MUST be heard within a ‘properly convened court de jure (a court of record standing under British constitutional law in public forum) ONLY.
With matters that may involve you and the policy enforcers (police) it is advised to serve the chief inspector of the local ‘nick’ a notice of your standing, we use a ‘Notice of Lawful Objection’….do you (chief inspector) lawfully object to my standing under Article 61 of Magna Carta 1215, if so why? I Provide you Fourteen (14) days to reply or it will be presumed by all parties that you agree entirely with my understandings of the law, and that I will receive no harassment – breaches of the peace, or trespass by any police constables.
Once a formal ‘Notice’ is served, co signed by three witnesses via recorded delivery, a copy of the notice retained with the postal receipt to prove it was accepted (check track and trace and record the delivery signature or take a screen shot) It is deemed to have been accepted in law.
You have acted honourably with nothing but the truth. Its a check-mate move if the process is done thoroughly/correctly according to law. We don’t leave them any wriggle room by keeping things very simple. We don’t argue the ins and outs of contractual agreements nor their rules because that is all besides the point.
We deal with British constitutional law ONLY as it’s the only way that we will ever retain it. All we demand is proof of jurisdiction.
QUICK GUIDE (Without examples of Notices)
STEP 1. Declare your standing in lawful rebellion (remove the presumption of your consent). This is done either by serving a Notice of conditional acceptance onto the person making demands on you or, if nobody is making any demand on you at the time a Notice of lawful objection to the local police chief inspector;
STEP 2. Conditionally accept any demands made upon you, whilst you are putting them on notice that Article 61 of Magna Carta 1215 is in effect today, and that they must provide evidence in substance (meaning evidence written down), that article 61 is no longer in effect (which cannot be done) therefore, the crown (courts, police, tax offices, councils etc) has no authority to make whatever demand is being made against you so, they obviously cannot provide evidence of such;
STEP 3. Serve a Notice of default and opportunity to cure if the first conditional acceptance Notice has been ignored or, your question has been ignored. We do this to remain in honour which is an important part of the process (you can serve a second Notice of default and opportunity to cure to give them yet another chance to respond to your original Notice if you like? (optional)….before serving the third Notice;
STEP 4. Serve the Notice of Default. You are now in default and have agreed by either tacit consent (ignoring you) or by lack of substance (providing no written evidence of them having authority to make demands upon you) that they have no legal claim against you goodbye;
STEP 5. Serve a Notice of Misprision of Treason on a persistent agent (making him/her personally liable for their actions under penalty of perjury). By evidencing acts of treason that have and are committed today, the agent would then have to decide whether or not to commit high treason in order to pursue you further.
If they are in the know, so called judges, and the higher echelons of the police service etc you will very unlikely hear from them again, and the summons or other demand for payment or whatever will invariably not be pursued;
STEP 6. (if required, which will likely bring another process being started against the police if they refuse to act). Report any harassment, coercion or attempt of extortion etc to the police. Demand an investigation and remind them of their Oath of office. You will need three witnesses to accompany you to the police station.
Within Article 61 of Magna Carta 1215 it states that no-one will be restrained from declaring their allegiance to the committee of the barons, and that anyone unwilling to stand with them (and us at this time) must be compelled to do so. Thus we all have a duty under the law to peacefully rebel against the crown, and also compel others to declare their allegiance to the barons committee, including of course the police.
Most people wont realize that they each have a duty by ‘royal command’ to rebel against a regime that does not abide by the peoples law (constitution). To understand this concept, which seems to be a contradiction in terms to some folk, that we each have a lawful duty by royal command to rebel against the crown, commanded by the crown.
It needs to be understood that Magna Carta 1215 was a treaty and contract which contained equal consideration like all other contracts. We are commanded to bring the crown to order, to see sense as it were or, to protect them from a covert takeover.
The Power of Unity and the Legacy of Magna Carta 1215
Knowledge is power, but unity is the key. Our ancestors understood that which is why standing under Article 61 is compulsory for all once it has been invoked. This peace treaty (MC 1215) effectively destroyed the ‘divine right of kings’, in which the king could do as he pleased without being subject to the common law.
King John and his mercenaries were reported to have been stealing land, cutting off noses and ears, taking out peoples eyes etc…..yes he was under duress to seal the Magna Carta or face losing the crown by revolt. The people represented by the barons had spoken. This treaty like all treaties was signed under duress, he didn’t particularly want to stop his psychopathic habits.
Indeed, he attempted to get Pope Innocent III to null and void the treaty the following year (1216). This was an act of treason as the pope has/had no authority over these shores whatsoever.. Article 61 of Magna Carta 1215 has been used on a number of occasions in history, not least in 1688 which brought about the ‘glorious revolution’.
This brought William and Mary to the throne and with them the Declaration of Rights and Coronation Oath Act into being. The Coronation Oath Act of 1688 bound the reigning monarch by said Oath and contract, to protect and observe the laws of god and the customs of the people of Britain.
The Erosion of Public Justice and Rise of Corporate Authority
Gradually, we have lost our fair system of justice by deception and misdirection, trials that were ALWAYS held within the public so that justice may be seen to be done under common law, no longer function in our land when it comes to the children.
Gradually, we have accepted these corporate hearings to such a degree that most people accept blindly that they are observing the law and, that they have the authority to make demands on us.
The concept that we are powerless within the system is another spoon fed subliminal concept. So….to summarise. We are supposed to living within a system of service, under the common laws of the realm. The law is NOT being observed within ANY of the judicial services today.
The law commands us to reject the crowns authority, peacefully by pledging our allegiance to the committee of barons whom invoked Article 61 of the Magna Carta on the 23rd March 2001…reported within the media (Daily Telegraph and Mail) so it cannot be denied.
It was invoked according to the correct protocols of British constitutional law which means anyone opposing it will be committing sedition, if not treason.
The death penalty for high treason still applies today. The 1795 Seditious and treasonous practices Act was NOT lawfully repealed by Tony Blair within chapter 36 of the 1988 Crime and Disorder Act. To attempt to do so was an act of high treason at common law.
He also committed a further two counts of treason by removing the word ‘Sovereignty’ from the police constables Oath of office and, by signing the ‘Nice’ treaty.
Political Betrayals and the Loss of Sovereignty
Thatcher signed the single European Act in 1989, John Major had Douglas Herd and Frances Maud sign the Maastricht Treaty 1992, Gordon Brown signed the Lisbon Treaty 2008 and the list goes on. You are a powerful individual in today’s society if you know the truth and wield it honourably with good intent.
Britain and the commonwealth has ‘National Sovereignty’ under a constitutional monarch (in ordinary times). National Sovereignty means just that, we are a nation of sovereign beings (kings and Queens in our own lands). The invocation of Article 61 qualifies you/me to act with power of attorney for others.
Nobody who may wish to disagree with that fact (police) have any authority whatsoever to even do so, whilst they are aiding and abetting a treasonous regime. Being assertive with the truth is not difficult. The truth is always evidential or it is hearsay end of…..with the lawful rebellion remedy no hearsay is ever required. Strategy.
Whereas under the law we ought not cause ourselves unnecessary harm or loss, as well as others, it pays to pick your battles well. If you need a car for work or whatever don’t fight the system on car tax, just pay it under duress, which you will be evidently doing anyway by standing under Article 61, so you don’t even need to declare it.
If I were to pay something under duress of circumstances I would add a V.C. Before my signature. (VC = Vi Coactus – meaning under duress). That means that you haven’t accepted liability for the payment or punishment you consent to, and if you have finished the process we use against these people, until forced by duress of circumstance to pay up or whatever, then you would have a claim against them in the future, because there is nowhere for it to be heard at this time, there are no courts of law they are all illegal corporate entities as previously said.
Demanding the Return of Common Law and Public Services
Our ‘mission’ so to speak, is to demand the return of the common law and due process of law, so we can have the matter of treason brought before real courts. I wouldn’t tackle the electric or gas corporations unless you are off grid, and had other means of those energies if required.
The water industry however is a stolen public service and is thus fair game, it cannot be legally cut off as it is a fundamental requirement for life. Thatcher sold this PUBLIC SERVICE mostly to the unaware people that already owned it. We should ONLY be paying for the upkeep of this service.
To pay for water and sewage at this time is to aid and abet theft. They can only reduce the water pressure to your home not cut you off so go for it. Council tax is also fair game as of course, since the crown has no authority neither does the council. Simple.
HMRC have already conceded defeat with regard to the use of Article 61, so its ultra fair game especially as they are so close to the deposed crown. The process we used can be viewed herein. Voting registration, TV licences, parking fines etc are all unenforceable via this process.
Starting the process by rebutting such simple demands first may give you more confidence in using it against greater demands.
Any alleged “summons” you get can be stopped, and if the police are forewarned of your intent it will make it much more difficult for them to act against you, because you can hold someone accountable if they do.
The Importance of Community and Mutual Support
The best thing that we can do for ourselves is gather small groups of like minded people to help defend each other (not that we have had any cause to do so), and as support for fellow rebels by supplying and receiving witness signatures for documents, and for general education purposes etc.
With a group, the council, police etc can be peacefully lobbied more easily, it’s much harder for 1 person to seize a public building for example.. The best way to approach this process is by having nothing pending i.e., fines, debts for tax etc, then you can choose the best way to distress the regime.
A Notice of lawful objection to the local top echelons of the police service, is always a good way to proceed.. you may pre-empt actions before they begin? Your intent cannot then be claimed to be…. just trying to get out of paying for stuff. You can even have fun using Article 61 and the lawful excuse it provides you.
Seizing a town hall for example is an interesting venture as long as it is done very calmly and you have documented facts of your claims in hand. You will need to be assertive with the police and demand that they stand under their oath of office, once they do then they must stand under common (constitutional law) and accept Article 61’s invocation or aid and abet treason in full knowledge of the facts.
The police left us to it at the town hall, but we only seized it to make the point to the councillors that we could, we had to make a stand after they refused to answer where they each stood with regard to Article 61’s invocation.
The Limits of Statutory Law and the Need for Balance
They provided us with a superb example of how lawful excuse can be used. The so called “law” with regard to motor vehicles is not law as it cannot be since the constitution was usurped in 1911 by the passing of the Parliament Act.
I think a balance must be struck though. I think we need laws to stop some people driving fast near schools or wherever lots of people walk, perhaps at certain times of the day even?
We all have a responsibility to use a car whilst being capable to do so safely of course, or we can easily cause serious harm or loss to others, so a driving test and certificate of competence should also be obtained before taking to the road.
Drinking alcohol and driving is a very dangerous act of course, which can kill innocent people and a law should definitely be there to discourage it (in my opinion).
What I think doesn’t even matter though, it’s what the collective people want once we get our country back, and that will only happen peacefully if we can get the police back on the side of the people.
We all need to ‘Lobby the Bobby’ (as we put it). Its one of the fundamental objectives of the movement. When using this process, create a file and keep it well ordered with all the documents you serve and receive.
Building a case file will make it very difficult if magistrates, county or crown courts attempt to kidnap you into their realm (I’ve rebutted at least six summonses, they have persisted but never acted upon any of them when it came to the crunch).
If you want a simple job to do you can go after any individual within the system to stand under Article 61…….at least we are educating people if nothing else by doing that. Some don’t listen unless or until they think that there maybe a real threat to their liberty or property by the evidence we serve them.
Whatever you do please share information with others and support others that maybe using this process in any way you can. One or two spokespersons and lots of silent witnesses are all that is required, with any group planning to enforce the law by seizing properties etc….recording the events silently and intimidatingly for the criminals is a good strategy, see how they squirm or act more like human beings.
David Robinson has laid the groundwork for us all to follow in order to restore our common law constitution Magna Carta 1215. It is now time for us all to initiate the Lawful Notice Process that he has procured and take action.
The original posting of this article can be found on the Web Archive.
For support from passionate, like-minded individuals, feel free to join the MC1215 Knowledge Centre Telegram Group.